The other day I heard a report on NPR about a festival of
the book and of art and music in Mosul, a city in Iraq coming back to life from
being under the heel of Isis terrorists. Under the previous regime, reading
books, listening to music and making art were forbidden on pain of death. I was moved by the sound of Iraqi music
and by the story of a man who learned English by means of a book he hid in his
house during the terror. He spoke of the joy of his humanity restored through being
able to walk through the streets with a book in his hand and music in the
air.
This story reminded me of an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education by Eric
Hayot, titled “The Imminent Death of the Humanities” (July 6, 2018). Fewer
students are majoring in the humanities these days and so are jobs for Ph.D.s
in the humanities fewer. “The humanities are institutionally more alone and
more vulnerable than ever before, “ writes Hayot, “more at the mercy of a university’s
financial decisions or a new dean’s desire to prove his or her toughness by
consolidating departments or reducing faculty size.” The doomsday clock is apparently
striking midnight for higher education in America.
The death of the humanities implies that education is no
longer about history, philosophy, comparative religion. No longer about
painting, poetry, sculpture, drama, architecture, dance, or music. No longer
about the rich varieties of human culture and spiritual experience. Education, the new paradigm suggests,
should be about learning the skills needed to survive and thrive in today’s
neo-liberal economic system. In
the new paradigm, the ideal achievement of one’s education would be to land a
job at Goldman-Sachs.
The old idea of a college education did include preparing for
one’s vocation. But there was also
space to explore. There were
so-called ‘electives’; courses you chose because you were curious about
something, Irish literature, ancient Roman history, Romantic music, and so on. The idea was to take time out to
discover your interests and passions, your ideals and the range of your
imagination. Higher education was
to enhance our humanity, not just make us more efficient cogs in the economic
machine.
Death of the humanities? What does that mean?
I spent some decades teaching the humanities in universities, and formed
an idea of what I was doing. I could
cite names of courses and titles of books—but that would be misleading. The humanities aren’t about acquiring
information or the ability to appreciate certain things labeled ‘classics’ or culturally
important—this again would miss the mark.
My conception of the humanities is radically simple. The humanities are about acquiring the
skills we need to become flourishing human beings. Our strictly marketable skills are technical and specialized
(like computer programming). But
there are more general skills that are about becoming more evolved human
beings.
For example, we all think; but how well do we think? Is our
instinct for reason intact? Do we
know anything about critical thinking? We all make choices, but how effective
are we at performing them? Are we
aware of our capacities to improve our lives? We all have feelings, but do we feel too much and too often
or too little or not at all? We
all have fives senses, but how well do we observe, how vividly experience the
colors and sounds, forms and textures, of the world around us?
We all (excepting our psychopaths) have a sense of right and
wrong, but how awake, pointed, and fair-minded is our perception of the right
and the wrong? Again, we vary in these
abilities. Some people don’t mind
if their leaders are liars or stewed in corruption; others do mind and attempt
to use their minds—and even risk speaking out against the wrong.
All these abilities we possess need to be refined and educated.
To expel the humanities from higher education today is to abandon our future to
a world dominated by inhuman calculation and the barbarism of profit worship. Thrown
into seas of information on the Internet, studies have shown that we are losing
the capacity for “deep reading”—another sign of the death of the humanities.
Reading that qualifies as deep offers a chance to enter into
a dialogue with the author’s mind. Reading online, you’re subject to endless distractions
and interruptions--ads, pop ups, likes, notifications, sign ups, emojis,
sudden audios, power-losses, and so on. The endless mobility of the Internet fragments consciousness
and makes it increasingly shallow.
In the post-humanities world we’re entering, you see people
walking around fondling their
“smart” phones or staring at them
as they walk, dead to the world around them--phone-entranced and phone-possessed.
The death of the humanities in higher education is a sign of descent into
possession by technology.
We need the humanities because we need to fully awaken our humanity. We need to work on the skills that make
us human. It takes time to learn
to think, to feel, to use our senses and our imagination, and to empathize with
victims of injustice. Technology
has its place, and getting good jobs are important, but we also need to learn
the basics of being human. If we screw
this up, technology and the mania for money will turn us into monsters.
The educational system become a sort of production line, the end product being the piece of paper or certificate of competence in whatever discipline. Such certificate does not guarantee the recipient is competent, it merely tells that the recipient has been 'approved' by the "pharisees of verbal orthodoxy" as Aldous Huxley called them in his many essays on the educational process.
ReplyDeletehttp://theylaughedatnoah.blogspot.com/2017/07/what-is-purpose-of-work-by-jd.html