We underestimate how words can change our sense of reality. Words can corner and confine us; they can also open doors and free us. Nowadays we often hear people say that they are spiritual but not religious. What that
usually means is something like this: I no longer attend religious services nor
do I accept as absolutely true any of the major claims of the basic
religions. Still, I have spiritual
needs, interests, and inclinations. I just don’t rely on organized religion to
explore and satisfy these needs. Religion is associated with established doctrines,
rules, and social organization; spirituality, with search, personal practice, and
experience.
As people grow up in our scientific culture—especially where
capitalism and consumerism thrive—traditional religions recede in
importance. But human nature
remains the same, and the issues of love, death, injustice, natural calamity,
happiness, suffering, meaning and purpose all
remain. The pews may be thinning out, but people still have the need for
meaning and transcendence. So the
search is on and new games of the spirit are afoot.
Words matter. The vocabulary of organized religion is a
turn-off for many today, which explains why the distinction between religious and spiritual is so popular.
People understand the distinction.
You can be spiritual without being religious.
There is another distinction some of us might find useful, but
this one might at first seem extreme.
Suppose we bracket the use of the term God and substitute the term consciousness.
A religious person says, I believe in God; immediately there’s
a problem. What does that
mean? What could it mean? God? A non-religious person doesn’t believe in such an entity as often
defined.
But now a spiritual person might say: I believe in
consciousness. The term,
consciousness, completely unlike the term God, we all know refers to
something. There is no agonizing
mystery, no soul-racking search for consciousness; we exist in our
consciousness, and the whole of our existence is known and experienced through
our consciousness. We cannot doubt
our relationship to consciousness, but we can doubt our relationship to God. We
cannot doubt the existence of our consciousness; but we can doubt the existence
of God.
This shift in terminology has a future. In fact, it has a
past in Indian thought where the divine is conceived as pure, transcendent
consciousness. In Indian thought,
there are thousands of gods, all in different ways manifestations of primordial
consciousness, which is beyond all creeds and religions, but is their root and ideal
aim.
Consciousness has a lot going for it as a candidate for a
new terminology of transcendence. Unlike
the term God, we know it refers to something real—inescapably and fundamentally
so. In contrast, the notion of God
has become a dubious idea, and is too often used as part of the vocabulary of political
oppression if not outright murder
and empire.
Benefits of this experiment in vocabulary? What do we gain
if we substitute the term consciousness for the term God? Again, to quote an Indian text (Rig
Veda) that struck me true when I first read it: “Truth is one; people call it
variously.” Most of the great
mystics point to the one mind that undergirds our evolving human
experience. Our own consciousness
is part of that transcendent reality, but our awareness of it is eclipsed by the
struggle for existence. So near and yet so far, we live in oblivion to our
hidden identity.
A new vocabulary may help us awaken to that hidden dimension
of ourselves. It is an experiment to perform, a way of seeing how the world appears
through the lens of a different language, as when we substitute ‘spiritual’ for
‘religious’, and ‘consciousness’ for ‘God’. Let’s push the idea a little, and suggest
a few other changes of vocabulary.
.
For example, I would substitute arts of transcendence for religion;
an enchanting perspective for revealed truth; experimental protocol for doctrine
and dogma; imagination for faith; distant conversation for prayer; athlete of
consciousness for saint; a contraction of consciousness for sin; the great
adventure for death;--and I could go on.
Each of these changes could open new ways of looking at old issues, if
we sat down and tried in detail to imagine how revising our vocabulary may be a
way of revising our awareness of things, and indeed of our very sense of
reality.
there is a new belief system, a course in miracles. somewhat new to me. it felt like you were expected to brainwash yourself to believe that every one and every thing in the world is rosy, wonderful and doesnt need fixing. i could see many benefits to this positive point of view. diverging the realities of big food, big pharma, evaporating liberties, bombardment of mind control on all sides does not benefit our confused populace. maybe the old mystery school information will elevate us in the end. the current movements prevent us from repairing societies issues and dethrone harmful agencies.
ReplyDelete