In the attempt to understand the nature
of mind, I’ve traveled all over the map of human experience. Inevitably, I was drawn to the outer
limits of mental experience, abnormal and supernormal. For example, I found all sorts of evidence suggesting the reality of a “next” world. Up until modern scientific times, belief
in an afterlife was common and widespread. However, modern science is supposed
to have proven the afterlife is a fairy tale.
But that is complete nonsense. Modern science has never investigated
the question because it has focused on physics, chemistry, biology, and other physical
sciences. The investigation of psychic powers has been conducted by individuals,
groups, and special societies such as the English and American Societies for
Psychical Research. A minority of mavericks has always had to battle the
physicalist establishment that ignored or dismissed their findings. This
unscientific attitude continues to poison the 21sst century, easily proven
by reading accounts of anything paranormal in Wikipedia.
Even so, various experiences that people report suggest the
reality of an afterlife—haunted houses, apparitions of the dead, deathbed
visions, near-death glimpses of the next world, reincarnation memories and
bodily marks, and mediums who claim to transmit information from excarnate minds. Each type here has variations, for
example, one in which an apparition seen in a hotel room is confirmed later as resembling
one who occupied and died in that room.
Here the counter-survivalist might say that dying suddenly in a hotel room left some kind
of a psychic trace detected by the rare sensitive but proves nothing about
survival.
A case from Michael Tymn’s informative The Searchlight (2018) struck me as a stunning afterlife phenomenon,
but let the person who had the experience speak:
A Brush with the Afterlife: Theresa Cheung, a University of
Cambridge graduate, claimed she had an encounter with her deceased mother.
Cheung, who has a master’s in theology and English, said that while driving
towards a junction behind a truck, she indicated to turn left until her late
mother’s voice told her to go change to the right lane. She said: “Even though
she had died a few years earlier, it was my mother’s voice, and I obeyed
instantly. If I had turned left, you wouldn’t be reading this now, because I
would have driven into a pile-up that claimed the lives of three people in cars
directly behind the lorry. To this day, I can’t explain that voice, other than
that it must have been my mother guiding me … It proved to me there is an
afterlife.”
(From: Kindred, Alahna. “Life after death: The
academics and experts who have proof of the afterlife.” Daily and Sunday
Express. 2018. express.co.uk/news/
weird/935615/life-after-death-afterlife-what-happens-when-you-die )
To play the devil’s advocate, we could explain this away, if
we grant that Theresa Cheung has latent psychic powers. We may then presume that her powers detected
imminent disaster and decide that warning the conscious Cheung is best done by
means of a warning from mom. Her life is saved, and she is quite naturally convinced it was her mom who saved
her. So on this interpretation,
our psychic powers may kick in to save our lives but mislead us into believing
in an afterlife.
Before addressing this possible reduction, I want to
describe a case I discuss in my book, Experiencing
the Next World Now, which in form is like Theresa Cheung’s experience of a
dead mom helping to avert a traffic fatality. I received it from a working nurse. Driving her car home from work, she stopped
for a light at a cross-ways. When
the light turned green she was about to hit the gas pedal when she saw her dead
mother standing right in front of the car. The nurse hit the brake and the instant she did so a truck
she didn’t see coming on her left ran the red light and would have killed her
if she hadn’t seen the ghost of her mom—which instantly vanished. Very much like Theresa’s experience, I’m
familiar with other cases of this type.
The nurse was convinced her mom had saved her. So what’s going on?
Well, we could explain survival away by assuming that our higher
powers (PK & ESP) work in ways that occasionally help but also deceive
us. They may sometimes aid in our pre-mortem
survival, but that’s it; the afterlife part remains an illusion. But that inference seems arbitrary,
possible but by no means compelling. After all, why do we have these inexplicable
powers? They don’t seem to be in
any way reliable as far as applied to
the business of living. In fact,
they’re known for a sad thing called “decline effect.” Worse, as often noted,
they seem actively evasive. Psychic
experiences are unpredictable, unreliable, often misleading and perhaps
systematically evasive. Why then
do we have them?
Maybe we have them not to serve the needs of embodied
life but to serve as the ontological basis of our disembodied afterlife. In the afterlife, we rely entirely on our
mind’s paranormal capacities; in a postmortem world, we would perceive and act solely by means of our
minds. So in that case the hypothesis of an afterlife explains why we have
supernormal abilities. At the same
time, our demonstrable supernormal abilities, largely useless in this life, at
the very least open a theoretical gate to the afterlife. It is often argued that our psychic
powers serve to explain away cases of apparent survival. What I’m suggesting is that the
survival hypothesis explains why we have psychic powers in the first place. Various lines of data point to a metaphysics of transcendent mind.
1 comment:
Mike --
Your model of the afterlife, in which Mind rules over Matter, a mirror image of Earthly life, suggests to me that you are familiar with Emmanual Swedenborg's remarkable "Heaven, its Wonders, and Hell". Have you written about Swedenborg's Vision in any of your blog posts?
Nick Herbert
Post a Comment