tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6889910938799271565.post7480594163758719266..comments2024-03-16T10:58:10.065-04:00Comments on Consciousness Unbound: Science and Super HumanityMichael Grossohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06044309674467126746noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6889910938799271565.post-21472766188453594462023-06-03T10:59:18.902-04:002023-06-03T10:59:18.902-04:00Hi Professor Michael Grosso: I'm uploading a n...Hi Professor Michael Grosso: I'm uploading a new talk on my youtube channel - I mention levitation again and my new article on global warming. Have you really researched the military disinformation surrounding "ufos" - i.e. aliens? There's been serious critique of hypnosis as a valid technique - in "ufology" - Greg Bishop delved into this - his book "Project Beta" is a good source on alien military disinfo. The book "Stargate Conspiracy" by Lynn Picknett and Clive Prince is another good source - they did a recent talk on youtube, a couple years ago, from a conference - on their Stargate Conspiracy book. People think they have taken it "too far" but I think they make a valid claim. haha. Mark Pilkington then made a book and documentary inspired by Greg Bishop's book. Nick Redfern's book "Body Snatcher's in the Desert" was a great expose on Roswell - that has been so central to ufology.<br />Also I recommend Douglas Valentine's new book "Pisces Moon: The Dark Arts of Empire" - and also H.P. Albarelli's books on the CIA mind control background. I also wrote a recent book focused on Andrija Puharich, paranormal, disinformation and noncommutativity - "There Is No Spoon" is the book title. It's on my academia edu site as "drew hempel" or else on Lulu - if you got to their bookstore and search the title.<br />thanks,<br />ecoechohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03307941947406787288noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6889910938799271565.post-72433633682659984432023-06-01T15:30:21.946-04:002023-06-01T15:30:21.946-04:00Sadly, fraud in science is probably much more ramp...Sadly, fraud in science is probably much more rampant than your post suggests. For example, consider the following: The reason why most published papers are later retracted from journals is because of some type of research misconduct. Well, last year alone, nearly 5,000 papers were retracted from the scientific literature, https://retractionwatch.com/2022/12/27/nearing-5000-retractions-a-review-of-2022/. Admittedly, that number is still a tiny fraction of the entire scientific literature, which is estimated to be about 1.8 million papers per year. But other indicators suggest that fraudulent papers will proliferate in the near future and the rise of 'paper mills', https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common, has greatly contributed to this malignancy. Now, with the advent of AI-driven programs like ChatGPT, which greatly facilitates the production of many forms of written work, the future of looks pretty bleak. Miguelnoreply@blogger.com