When I was a boy and found some nice presents under the tree
on Christmas morning, I was happy.
There they were, beautifully wrapped, and waiting for me. Santa Claus came as I hoped he would, so I had a rush of
happiness. But suppose nothing turned
up under the tree? The way I
experienced happiness was actually a trap. The absence, or eventual loss, of
the thing that made me happy could make me unhappy.
When the doctor pronounces me in
good health, I feel happy; should he inform me of some problem, I feel unhappy
at once. I’m happy if
somebody treats me with respect and generosity; regard me with scorn or
indifference, unhappiness is likely to follow. Affirm my being, I am happy; negate it, watch how disgruntled
I get. And so it goes. Happiness is a see-saw. Something I
discovered early on--happiness depended on something external to myself.
The wheel of fortune turned and I
was taken for a pleasant ride.
Happiness always takes us for a ride—we are like children piled in a
wagon, pulled along on a bumpy road, happy for the moment with all the sights
and sounds.
Then there’s the happiness of the
imagination. I was happy imagining
a date with a certain pretty girl.
But when I had the experience itself – the real date in the real world –
it was not quite what I expected. I was happier yearning for something
imaginary than experiencing something real.
I wondered about the nature of
happiness. Maybe there was a different kind of happiness, less prone to getting
hung up on something you have no control over.
Some experiences I had contained
hints of this higher felicity.
I
was on my first trip to Europe when I had a memorable experience hitchhiking
across the Italian Alps. Knapsack
on my back, I felt with sudden keenness an unknown pure joy, traveling as I
was, light and free under the open sky. This was the happiness of spring,
youth, adventure. Traveling under the open sky was sufficient for complete
happiness. Then I got hungry and
tired and the bliss faded.
Was
there such a thing as a higher happiness? If there was, it continued to elude
me. Happiness, as it comes and goes, seems very much a mercurial creature of imagination;
I could never pin it down.
Happiness
for most of us is circumstantial, and to a large extent, accidental. One day
fate strokes us; the next she bashes us.
I wondered if the sages, the inspired poets, the mystics had actually
glimpsed a happiness that was absolute. It sounded like they did sometimes, but I wondered if they
were exaggerating, leaving out details that were less happy.
If there is a higher happiness, you
probably have to change your whole lifestyle. All the things we normally crave and think we need—we’d relax
our hold on them, dump them overboard if need be. We would cease to expect handouts of happiness from life.
Enjoy them when they come but minus addiction.
This train of thought leads to the
mystical conception of happiness, often described with counter-intuitive terms
like Nichts, sunyata, fana,
annihilation, emptiness, nothing, and so on. Chuang Tzu, that amiable Chinese
philosopher, had this to say about happiness:
“My opinion is that you never find
happiness until you stop looking for it.”
In other words, don’t look, because
it isn’t outside you. If it’s anywhere, it has to be inside. Or, as the Stoics
were fond of saying, it’s not things but the way we interpret things that makes
us unhappy.
Any attempt to look for happiness
is self-defeating. So Chuang Tzu
adds, “My greatest happiness consists precisely in doing nothing whatsoever
calculated to obtain happiness; and this in the minds of most people is the
worst possible course.”
Some
say you have to go through the dark night of the soul before you can see the
sunrise of eternity. It sounds like crazy wisdom to identify happiness with
nothingness. And yet the Sufi
mystics discourse on fana, the
nothingness of the ego. The
Kabbala maps the way to mystical nothingness. Buddhism’s main metaphor is the snuffing out of
all-consuming desire, the extinction of the flame of greed and obsession.
Aquinas called the road to divine happiness a via negativa. “It’s
not this! It’s not this!”
Epicurus
put it like this: the enlightened soul is happy on the rack. (No doubt a wild
exaggeration.) It doesn’t matter
what kind of external goods you have. External goods should be valued, but
taken with a grain of salt. The reason is clear. They set us up for the happiness trap.
No comments:
Post a Comment